The Supreme Court may be forced to nullify the presidential elections again based on the following reasons:
- That the election was conducted against the greater public interest, which is a noble principle in democracy, constitutionalism and the rule of law.
- That the election did not take place in all the 290 constituencies contrary to the provision of the constitution.
- That the IEBC hired returning officers in an irregular manner which amounted to an illegality as asserted by the high court.
- The illegal stay of the high court issued by Justice Githinji of the appellate court at night in a matter that was previously ex-parte.
- The forging of signature of Judges Fatuma Sichale and Martha Koome by Justice Githinji of the appellate court who stayed the high court order.
- Gazetting Raila and Uhuru only in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling of 2013, but when Raila uses the same ruling to withdraw, IEBC failed to conduct fresh nominations.
- Printing of ballot papers with Jirongo’s name despite the declaratory order of bankruptcy which was later successfully appealed.
- The failure to reconfigure the KIEMS kits to accommodate all presidential candidates, only having Uhuru and Raila.
- Failure to send the result in the prescribed form of scanned copies of statutory forms simultaneously with the text messages.
- Contradictory statements from Abdi Guliye and Chebukati over the accuracy of KIEMS kits in establishing voter turnout.
- Issuing of arbitrary statements with contradictions over the exact number of people who turned out to vote.
- Failure to to transmit voter turnout number by returning officers within the intervals of two hours from 7am to 5pm as stipulated by election act.
- The resignation of Roselyine Akombe and her damning letter of the IEBC ineptitude in expediting a free and fair election.
- The buttressing of Akombe’s position by Chebukati 24 hours later by asserting that the commission was not in a position to carry out free and fair election.
